View Map. The optical quality is good for a telescope of this type, but for planetary observing a different instrument would be preferable, such as the 130 mm reflector in the same range. How does the StarSense Explorer 102 compare with the CELESTRON ASTRO FI 102 MM WI-FI MAKSUTOV CASSEGRAIN? If you prefer a smaller refractor, then the 102AZ below could work but will almost certainly cost more. All the telescopes from Celestron Edge HD and Schmidt-Cassegrain are compatible with the Starsense app. ), Deimos vs Titania (How Are They Different? Thats because of their aperture. It doesnt suffer from chromatic aberration and delivers a much sharper image of the night sky. Thanks to your phones limited battery life and computing power, the StarSense Explorer technology obviously cant take a new picture of the sky every time you move the telescope. Even heavier and larger. You can find the Celestron dx 130az on Aliexpress for a relatively cheaper price. Heavy and large. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Stargazing Help came into existence when some young minds got mesmerized by outer space while camping. Im very new to Astromony and have a chance to get a Celestron C102-HD. The pros of the lens included within the StarSense include the following : Overall, even though the optics within this telescope arent necessarily the most accurate when it comes to colours, it will still provide a solid experience for most. You Pay: $559.00. What these StarSense Explorer telescopes do is attach your smartphone then, using the app, scan the night sky above you, tell you what you can see on that particular night, and then guide you to it. Senior Software Developer (Former Employee) - Bangalore, Karnataka - April 23, 2023. The StarSense app also lists 5-inch and 6-inch Schmidt-Cassegrains . So, if you want a telescope that can form clearer images, go for the Celestron Starsense Explorer dx 130az. This forum and community is a wonderful resource! We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. ), but techy enough to use either. Telescope Mount Type: Alt-Azimuth. Any advice would help. Locate faint, deep-sky objects in seconds and see them in more detail . Yes, you can take astrophotography pictures with the Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes using a smartphone adapter like this basic one or this premium one. So unless you can be sure it has those or the price is absurdly low, wed recommend you pass. The reason why this is a problem is because simply adjusting the axis to allow for a more smooth motion may take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour to do. Your smartphone's camera must be sensitive enough to image the brighter stars on a night setting. Can you describe how you were able to loosen? how do they compare? The extra ingredient over a standard manual mounting is the attachment for a smartphone, directly fixed to the central assembly. Deep-sky objects are a little less exciting. Celestron StarSense Explorer 8" Dobsonian, Celestron Starsense Explorer 10" Dobsonian, The lightest, most portable, and easiest to operate in the range, Generally the cheapest (although check prices). I understand because they have the same focal length they give the same views in any given eyepiece, but using the area of a circle (pi x radius squared) 102 = 8171, and 130 = 13273. Refractor optics can be further broken down into achromatic and apochromatic, where the former and lesser quality of the 2 is used within the StarSense Explorer. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Their knowledge of the subject, combined with features like a price match promise, free lifetime tech support, a 30-day return policy, and financing choices, makes them a great pick. For the 102 Ill need to likely buy a star diagonal, while for the 130 Ill need to buy a Cheshire or laser collimator so still a tie. But they take more time to set on the mount than dx 102az usually takes. +91-120-406-2000. In terms of magnification that's a significant step-up from the 'toy' telescopes that dominate . There are four instruments in the Celestron StarSense Explorer range: an 80 mm refractor, a 114 mm reflector, the 102 mm refractor under test, and a 130 mm reflector. The StarSense Explorer DX mount is nothing more than a repainted Omni XLT AZ or AZ3 mount with a bracket for the StarSense Explorer device. Celestron StarSense Explorer DX100AZ vs. DX 102AZ - posted in Refractors : There is about a $100 difference in these two packages, but there is only 2 mm difference in the aperture. (Explained!). Generally, refractors are less bulky and easier to operate. -cam, Zane great review as always thanks. Overall, this is the most entry-level of the four telescopes in this range. The downside is that it is heavier and bulkier, so you should think about where you will use it and whether you value power over portability. . No, a dedicated short focal length eyepiece is better. The only major complaint was to do with the inaccuracy of the apps tracking ability, especially when users decided to look further out. The pricing of this instrument is not significantly less than that of the Celestron NexStar 102 SLT the same instrument on a fully motorized mount, which has the great advantage of tracking objects for you. Saturns rings and the Cassini Division within them look fabulous, while its dimmer moons and cloud belts are a bit harder to spot. The Celestron dx 102 uses about 240x magnification power. Hence Celestron dx 130 wins again this round. The Celestron Starsense explorer dx 102az telescope uses one of the oldest types of telescope optics. It doesnt have issues like chromatic aberration like the dx 102az. But its only limited to brighter objects in the night sky. This is not to be confused with smartphone attachments that simply enable you to take photos of bright objects through the eyepiece, as found on some other beginners instruments. We're pleased to report that loading and using the software on our Moto G8 phone was easy and quite intuitive. Which eyepieces would you suggest to replace those less-than-ideal ones that come with the Stars Sense 130? Way better scope but not comparable mount wise. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Our team of experts has reviewed and ranked 180+ telescopes based on price and quality. Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. Read the full Earning Disclosure here. These eyepieces have a lot of plastic in their build, but use glass optics and are fairly sharp, with more eye relief than a typical Plossl ocular (particularly beneficial with the 10mm). I'm aware the reflector has a larger aperture (though the secondary mirror erodes this advantage a little?) Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. 6mm goldline and/or a 2x Barlow would be my first picks. This refers to the telescopes build and shape. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Here is a quick video that shows how this works: This is a great, innovative feature that takes advantage of the smartphone that you probably already own, and gives you something simpler and cheaper than a fully computerized telescope. Overall The StarSense Explorer 102AZ is very competent refractor telescope, thats potable, easy to set up, has solid optics and decent enough in box accessories for the price. How Do The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZsOptics Work? Read why we prefer High Point Scientific to Amazon. Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! In instructions intended for raw beginners, points such as this are vital. The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ is an achromatic refractor, with a 102 mm doublet lens composed of two different types of glass. If you compare their size, 130az is quite big and heavy. The Astro-Fi cant be used manually but is more capable overall. Apparently, they both go with dx 102az and 130 az. The Celestron NexStar telescope range are all full computerized compound / catadioptric telescopes. As a result, youll get quite an exhilarating image. Particularly under dark skies, bright nebulae like Orion and the Lagoon look great, but planetary nebulae such as the Cats Eye are really too small and dim to be interesting in the 102. The Celestron dx 102az telescope is not good for viewing faint objects. There's also the Explorer DX 130AZ . Often this makes for more comfortable viewing with less stooping. Every slow-motion control I've ever seen attaches to the mount using visible small thumb screws. Rating: 9/10. As noted above, the 102 in the name refers to the telescopes aperture of 102mm (4-inch). Youll be able to see Andromeda and other galaxies. Improved focal ratio for better photography, Less cumbersome than the larger models below, Less power (aperture) than the two reflector options below, More aperture and better views with 4.5 inch aperture, One of the cheaper options alongside the 80AZ model, Larger, heavier, more cumbersome, and less portable than the refractors above, Large aperture for the best views of objects in the night sky, Larger, heavier, more cumbersome, and less portable than the other models. For example, if Saturn or the Andromeda galaxy are above you that night, you can select them on the app and then follow the arrows on the app to point the telescope at them. Dx 102azs optical design also has chromatic aberration issues. In short, this is a brilliant telescope for viewing the night sky. If on the other hand youre willing to spend a bit more for telescope that are more powerful but will require a bit more tinkering, the SkyWatcher Dobsonian 6-inch or the skyquest XT6 is most certainly worth looking into too. Stargazinghelp.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by linking to Amazon.com. ), Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ Review (A Good Beginner Device!? Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. ), Celestron Omni XLT 102 Review (Worth It Or Overpriced!? The eyepiece for the 102mm will be better positioned for the little one. The tube itself is around 81 cm long. I had what seemed to be a related question, which has come up somewhat in that main thread: whether to purchase the DX . But it can suffer from spherical aberration. All these instruments are standard members of the Celestron range and are available in other mounting packages. STARSENSE EXPLORER APP: The app generates a list of the best objects to view based on your exact time & location. 10.7 Arcsec-(Rayleigh)0.89 Arcsec-(Dawes), 1.37 Arcsec-(Rayleigh)1.14 Arcsec-(Dawes), Has more magnification power and forms better views, Less expensive but doesnt provide enough features considering the price. The advantage with these models is that the Schmidt-Cassegrain design allows high aperture in a much more compact body. It focuses the image on a single point. Its focal length is 660 mm. You need to consider where you will use and store it. at Amazon. What you can see will improve according to the size of the aperture. It has an aperture of 114 mm (4.5 inches). Which Celestron StarSense telescope is best? The bracket fits most phones and will work just fine even if you have a relatively thick case (or even a PopSocket). Should I buy a used StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ? On your phones screen, youll see the current position of your telescope. Patented, award-winning StarSense sky recognition technology uses your smartphone to analyze star patterns overhead and calculate the telescope's position in real-time. Once you undergo a super-simple alignment procedure, the StarSense Explorer app has thousands of objects it can find for youthe Moon, planets, most of the Messier catalog, and many more. Zane, thanks for the great review, it helped convince me to buy a StarSense 102! So, that really shortens out your options. Jupiter, Venus, Saturn and Mars should look pretty great through the scope and fairly easy to locate. Celestron dx 130az has a focal ratio of f/5. What about the Skywatcher skymax 102, 127 AZ GTI WIFI telescope? However, refractors are traditionally more robust than reflectors, so there is no ideal instrument to suit everyone. Celestron dx 130az has a focal ratio of f/5. Its focal length is about 650 mm. Celestron dx 102az weighs around 6.4 kg. Uranus and Neptune might barely be viewable at the max magnification that the Infinity 102AZ can handle. One is achromatic and another is apochromatic. Like other achromatic refractors, the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ still has some false color, which reveals itself as colored fringes around the edges of objects, particularly at high magnification, and the short tube results in inherently more false color than with a longer focal-ratio achromatic instrument. Smartphones can be fitted into a spring-loaded slider on the StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ, allowing for basic astrophotography. This model and the 102 AZ are refractors. Type of Electronics: Manual - Smartphone with StarSense Explorer App Assisted. This would be my first telescope and looking for Push To feature to help my 9 year old and me get into exploring the skies. Thanks Zane; Ill take a look at Dob reviews. However, I want to share a great tip with you. Celestrons 1.25 prism is pretty good; a dielectric unit like Aperturas improves performance and wont scratch your eyepieces thanks to the equipped compression ring adapter. Its a simple, aluminum-legged alt-azimuth mount with slow-motion controls on both axes. StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ Refractor. Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, Celestrons StarSense Explorer line of telescopes are some of the newest, and arguably most innovative telescopes on the market, and the newest effort of Celestron to make using a telescope as easy as possible. The scope is alsoavailable on Amazon, which is unquestionably the most popular e-retailer in the United States, even when telescopes aloneare taken into account. StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ vs 102AZ - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hi all, Ive been following the StarSense Explorer main thread, which has a lot of great information and seems particularly targeted towards adapting the bracket/mirror towards other telescopes. Overall, this is a great option if you want high power in a compact package and have the budget to pay a little more for this. Are Celestron StarSense Explorer telescopes computerized / GOTO? Its a good magnification for viewing the Moon, planets, smaller deep-sky objects like globular clusters, and splitting double stars. Just recently purchased DX130. Although the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 102AZ didn't make into our list of the best telescopes (opens in new tab) for 2021, it's still an excellent piece of kit for those just starting out in skywatching, especially those who are hunting for an all-inclusive package that's easy to use and makes navigating the night sky a breeze. Celestron is one of the most renowned brands making telescopes. For a summary of the entire discussion take a look at this table: Between these two Newtonian and refractor telescopes Celestron dx 130az is a better option. $449.95. (Image credit: Celestron) The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ is a 130-mm (5.1-inch) Newtonian reflector. In this range, the 80 mm refractor and 114 mm reflector are supplied on lighter-weight mountings, while the 102 mm refractor and 130 mm reflector have the same heavier mounting.
Https E Pass Jharkhand Nic In,
Wilton Building Department,
Articles C